<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call of Duty 5 Details</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.playerzblog.com/call-of-duty-5-details.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.playerzblog.com/call-of-duty-5-details.html</link>
	<description>Playerz Experience !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: trank_22</title>
		<link>http://www.playerzblog.com/call-of-duty-5-details.html/comment-page-1#comment-7593</link>
		<dc:creator>trank_22</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 04:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playerzblog.com/?p=2329#comment-7593</guid>
		<description>i agree with how the technology element was reaally put into cod4, and when i think of how that may alter the online...bleh...cause 3&#039;s online wasnt anything special at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with how the technology element was reaally put into cod4, and when i think of how that may alter the online&#8230;bleh&#8230;cause 3&#8217;s online wasnt anything special at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Codrut Nistor</title>
		<link>http://www.playerzblog.com/call-of-duty-5-details.html/comment-page-1#comment-6394</link>
		<dc:creator>Codrut Nistor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:48:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playerzblog.com/?p=2329#comment-6394</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a step back in history, and I hope it won&#039;t be a step back in terms of gameplay and story telling. Maybe we&#039;ll get some Star Wars-action in CoD 6, after all...

What were you expecting from CoD 5, after all?(I am not crazy about the idea of another WWII-based shooter either)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a step back in history, and I hope it won&#8217;t be a step back in terms of gameplay and story telling. Maybe we&#8217;ll get some Star Wars-action in CoD 6, after all&#8230;</p>
<p>What were you expecting from CoD 5, after all?(I am not crazy about the idea of another WWII-based shooter either)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Debaser</title>
		<link>http://www.playerzblog.com/call-of-duty-5-details.html/comment-page-1#comment-6393</link>
		<dc:creator>Debaser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:42:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playerzblog.com/?p=2329#comment-6393</guid>
		<description>Honest to god, if I play another WW1 or WW2 based FPS, someone is going to get seriously hurt.

Why would they take such a massive step back? CoD4 was fan-friggin-tastic! I loved the way the new technology was worked in. 

Gah. I&#039;ll probably play it anyway</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honest to god, if I play another WW1 or WW2 based FPS, someone is going to get seriously hurt.</p>
<p>Why would they take such a massive step back? CoD4 was fan-friggin-tastic! I loved the way the new technology was worked in. </p>
<p>Gah. I&#8217;ll probably play it anyway</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

