<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Craft II, a Sequel or Merely a Replica?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.playerzblog.com/star-craft-ii-a-sequel-or-merely-a-replica.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.playerzblog.com/star-craft-ii-a-sequel-or-merely-a-replica.html</link>
	<description>Playerz Experience !</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:26:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Introspective</title>
		<link>http://www.playerzblog.com/star-craft-ii-a-sequel-or-merely-a-replica.html/comment-page-1#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator>Introspective</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Aug 2009 07:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.playerzblog.com/?p=3787#comment-8477</guid>
		<description>The trailers shows that sequel will be at least as good as original was. But this delaying of game launch seems to be more matter of monetization strategy, not development issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The trailers shows that sequel will be at least as good as original was. But this delaying of game launch seems to be more matter of monetization strategy, not development issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

